I sincerely appreciate the summarized views presented by Mr. Vetrinichayam.See this link
http://bankers-sangharsh.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=234
IBA has submitted in the latest affidavit in Madras High Court that they are unable to pay pension to retirees because retirees did not refund their PF portion as per agreement in view of stay order. Hence they have prayed for vacation of stay.
It shows that banks are not in a position of paying pension to very few retirees. . What will happen when number of pension optees increases?
IBA has carved out 8.25%, 9.25% and 13% out of payable arrear to employees during 7th, 8th and 9th bipartite settlement respectively for smooth payment of existing pension optees.It means PF optees shared the burden of pension payable to pension optees.
One can imagine very well what will happen in near future when bank will ask for 20% out of payable arrear and government will put restriction on wage increase to less 20%.
Obviously future of all pension optees, existing or prospective is in danger.
Therefore one must make scrutiny of accounts of pension fund and provident fund of last 15 years in each bank to ascertain whether any fraudulent activity is going on or IBA is telling while lie in court. After all it is question of social security and it is duty of all bank employees to ascertain the truth. Pension optees in particular have to be sure whether they will get pension and their family members will be given pension after their death as they are dreaming now.
Mr. Vetrinichayam has rightly pointed out that when bank can pay 14% for new comers in pension domain why are they hesitant to pay even 10% for existing PF optees which are mandatory and which all banks are supposed to contribute.
If they are continuously paying this 10% towards pension fund why do they always need support in pension fund during bipartite settlement? What mischievous motive is behind such sharing of cost ?
Lastly why banks cannot shoulder the burden of full pension for their own employees and why the same banks sacrifice thousands of crores of rupees every year in loan waiver and compromise. What is the need of showing profit of thousand of rupees after exploiting own employees.
Our banks are called as government bank. Why government cannot share pension burden as they are providing budgetary support to other central government and state government employees?
Why is such discriminatory attitude of government towards bank employees who are participating in all government sponsored schemes even under acute shortage of manpower.
After all union leaders are doing?
Great writer Sri Munsi Prem Chand had rightly written in his noble books “Jab rakchak hi bhakchak ban jaye to vinash nischit hai”.
DANENDRA JAIN
05.10.2010
Wednesday, August 04, 2010
Monday, July 26, 2010
Pension offer by Banks
"Accepting the settlement in its present form would result in miscarriage of justice."
Justice in fact already miscarried on Historic Day for bankers i.e. 27th April 2010, now actually passing through washing operation in hope of getting justice.
Banks already deducted at source not only TDS on entire arrear (including the amount which is deposited in pension fund), it already recovered 2.8 times from PF optees but it willfully ignored offering pension letter in fear of Writ filed at Madras High Court.
It appears to IBA as if Madras High court had stayed pension offer and allowed recovery from PF optees. Please verify from contents of court order. Please re look into wording of order given by learned Judge whether stay was on pension or on recovery.
Pension is social security, Mr. Ashok Goel rightly admits it and he has true apprehension in his mind that Banks may not offer pension option if recovery is stopped by learned court. He along with Sri Pradip Kumar learned advocate of Supreme Court is truly and rightly worried of pain of PF optees retiring in coming days if they are not given second option of pension.
Sir I like to add one line here that heaven is not going to fall even if pension offer is not given, PF optees will survive with his head high and with dignity. God will give them adequate food at least better than our Union leaders who signed the said “Historic Agreement” because their own conscience will curse them.
Banks are giving pension out of fund created by PF contribution (Bank’s portion) refunded to them. Has any bank spent any amount from expenditure account in the past as central government use to do for their employees every year?
I raise some questions and hope anyone who knows about the same will reveal the clear picture.
What is total accumulated fund in pension account?
What amount is deposited every month by bank in pension fund on behalf of pension optees?
Or whether it may be confirmed that banks are actually crediting bank’s contributory share in pension fund for each pension opees each month (as in the case of PF opees )? I doubt banks are doing so.
What amount is actually paid by a bank every year to it’s retire employees? And what amount is refunded to retirees every month on an average?
Can anyone mathematically assess the clear picture of anyone bank to ascertain and forcefully confirm that in future banks will face crisis if fresh recovery is not made from PF optees?
Had our learned leaders not agreed for sharing in 7th and 8th Bipartite, bank employees could get higher salary and higher PF contribution. In fact , it appears to me that IBA reduced wage hike during 7th and 8th Bipartite Settlement but did not make actual credit in pension fund what they saved on account of lesser wage hike.
Can anyone confirm that banks are maintaining two separate funds, one for PF optees and another for pension optees? If not, how IBA or UFBU came to conclusion that banks will face crisis of fund if they agreed for second option of pension?
And if there are two separate funds in each bank, can anyone say what is the real balance accumulated in pension fund , what they are likely to get from PF fund if they offer pension offer and what monthly accretion will happen in pension fund keeping in view bank’s contribution of 10% and monthly interest?
Whether pension fund is prudently and wisely managed to earn profit or used as a tool to inflate bank’s operational profit or deposit?
Whether it is not true that banks are parking PF/Pension fund in fixed deposit and earning less interest compared to what they use to pay to employees?
Can anyone confirm that there are no avoidable expenditure from such funds?
Whether Banks are using profitably the amount which is accumulated out of employee’s share in PF of 10% and withheld with bank with PF Trustees? This fund is in hundreds of crores of rupees with each bank and banks need to invest the fund to earn maximum profit and give dividend to employees and not simply park them idly.
Above mentioned questions will help in knowing the probable burden to each bank if all PF optees switch over to pension. These facts are necessary because an employee suffers and lives in crisis for 30 to 40 years when he serves the bank only to make his residual life of hardly 10 years painless and pain free.
As an individual everyone who is afraid of not getting pension offer should ponder over following questions
1. How much amount he is going to sacrifice (Bank’s contribution in PF) on his date of retirement keeping in view fresh addition and interest accrual. (In other words when will he retire and by that time what will be the expected growth and what will be the final accumulated amount when he or she retires.)
2. How many years he or she will then survive, a rough estimate
3. Whether the amount he will get (if he does not get pension offer) will not be adequate to give him pension at Bank's rate of pension till he survives or his family survives to get pension offer. Please be practical
4. Finally say whether banks will gain or you will gain.
5. How much banks are expected to gain if we take into consideration the average age of bank employees, especially bank officers.
Now say whether mountain is going to fall if pension offer is denied to PF optees.
Yes mountain may fall on family if one dies during the serving period or you say in case of premature death. Out of three lac PF optees in bank for whom entire dispute has come on the floor in banking industry, there will be hardly a few thousand cases of premature death and in whose cases banks will have to pay pension for a longer period though with lesser amount of pension. For this one or two thousand of death cases banks is worried so much they are bent upon giving worries to entire banking community. I think Insurance companies in such cases may give better return if the same amount (which is deposited by banks in PF fund every month) is given to them.
Now everyone will perhaps agree to protest disputed recovery from PF optees and prefer justice instead of blindly purchasing pension offer in the name of social justice.
IBA and UFBU are jointly trying to impose injustice in the name of social justice.
Justice in fact already miscarried on Historic Day for bankers i.e. 27th April 2010, now actually passing through washing operation in hope of getting justice.
Banks already deducted at source not only TDS on entire arrear (including the amount which is deposited in pension fund), it already recovered 2.8 times from PF optees but it willfully ignored offering pension letter in fear of Writ filed at Madras High Court.
It appears to IBA as if Madras High court had stayed pension offer and allowed recovery from PF optees. Please verify from contents of court order. Please re look into wording of order given by learned Judge whether stay was on pension or on recovery.
Pension is social security, Mr. Ashok Goel rightly admits it and he has true apprehension in his mind that Banks may not offer pension option if recovery is stopped by learned court. He along with Sri Pradip Kumar learned advocate of Supreme Court is truly and rightly worried of pain of PF optees retiring in coming days if they are not given second option of pension.
Sir I like to add one line here that heaven is not going to fall even if pension offer is not given, PF optees will survive with his head high and with dignity. God will give them adequate food at least better than our Union leaders who signed the said “Historic Agreement” because their own conscience will curse them.
Banks are giving pension out of fund created by PF contribution (Bank’s portion) refunded to them. Has any bank spent any amount from expenditure account in the past as central government use to do for their employees every year?
I raise some questions and hope anyone who knows about the same will reveal the clear picture.
What is total accumulated fund in pension account?
What amount is deposited every month by bank in pension fund on behalf of pension optees?
Or whether it may be confirmed that banks are actually crediting bank’s contributory share in pension fund for each pension opees each month (as in the case of PF opees )? I doubt banks are doing so.
What amount is actually paid by a bank every year to it’s retire employees? And what amount is refunded to retirees every month on an average?
Can anyone mathematically assess the clear picture of anyone bank to ascertain and forcefully confirm that in future banks will face crisis if fresh recovery is not made from PF optees?
Had our learned leaders not agreed for sharing in 7th and 8th Bipartite, bank employees could get higher salary and higher PF contribution. In fact , it appears to me that IBA reduced wage hike during 7th and 8th Bipartite Settlement but did not make actual credit in pension fund what they saved on account of lesser wage hike.
Can anyone confirm that banks are maintaining two separate funds, one for PF optees and another for pension optees? If not, how IBA or UFBU came to conclusion that banks will face crisis of fund if they agreed for second option of pension?
And if there are two separate funds in each bank, can anyone say what is the real balance accumulated in pension fund , what they are likely to get from PF fund if they offer pension offer and what monthly accretion will happen in pension fund keeping in view bank’s contribution of 10% and monthly interest?
Whether pension fund is prudently and wisely managed to earn profit or used as a tool to inflate bank’s operational profit or deposit?
Whether it is not true that banks are parking PF/Pension fund in fixed deposit and earning less interest compared to what they use to pay to employees?
Can anyone confirm that there are no avoidable expenditure from such funds?
Whether Banks are using profitably the amount which is accumulated out of employee’s share in PF of 10% and withheld with bank with PF Trustees? This fund is in hundreds of crores of rupees with each bank and banks need to invest the fund to earn maximum profit and give dividend to employees and not simply park them idly.
Above mentioned questions will help in knowing the probable burden to each bank if all PF optees switch over to pension. These facts are necessary because an employee suffers and lives in crisis for 30 to 40 years when he serves the bank only to make his residual life of hardly 10 years painless and pain free.
As an individual everyone who is afraid of not getting pension offer should ponder over following questions
1. How much amount he is going to sacrifice (Bank’s contribution in PF) on his date of retirement keeping in view fresh addition and interest accrual. (In other words when will he retire and by that time what will be the expected growth and what will be the final accumulated amount when he or she retires.)
2. How many years he or she will then survive, a rough estimate
3. Whether the amount he will get (if he does not get pension offer) will not be adequate to give him pension at Bank's rate of pension till he survives or his family survives to get pension offer. Please be practical
4. Finally say whether banks will gain or you will gain.
5. How much banks are expected to gain if we take into consideration the average age of bank employees, especially bank officers.
Now say whether mountain is going to fall if pension offer is denied to PF optees.
Yes mountain may fall on family if one dies during the serving period or you say in case of premature death. Out of three lac PF optees in bank for whom entire dispute has come on the floor in banking industry, there will be hardly a few thousand cases of premature death and in whose cases banks will have to pay pension for a longer period though with lesser amount of pension. For this one or two thousand of death cases banks is worried so much they are bent upon giving worries to entire banking community. I think Insurance companies in such cases may give better return if the same amount (which is deposited by banks in PF fund every month) is given to them.
Now everyone will perhaps agree to protest disputed recovery from PF optees and prefer justice instead of blindly purchasing pension offer in the name of social justice.
IBA and UFBU are jointly trying to impose injustice in the name of social justice.
Friday, July 23, 2010
O P Bhatt IBA Chairman
I call upon CMDs of various banks to listen the voice of silent protestors, read the contents of writs filed in various high courts, opinion published in website such allbankingsolutions.com, open your eyes and ears and act fastly to correct the mistake done on 27.04.2010.
Please do not kill the voice coming from your own heart and mind. None of the respectable, wise, experienced, intelligent , talented, law abiding , and knowledgeable person in the banking industry of lawyers club of India will concur with injustice done to Non pension optees through the 9th Bipartite settlement
Since courts are slow, you cannot perpetuate reign of injustice in wage agreement for long as you are doing injustice in promotion processes and transfer decisions and employees of India cannot allow you to use discriminatory and divisive wage scale defying fundamental Laws of equality enshrined in Indian Constitution.
Various letters have been written to important dignitaries of the country in this regard by so many persons working in different banks. But unfortunately politicians of our country also do not understand the problem of victims for years and years, decades ad decades as long as there is mass movement, violent agitation arsoning, strike, lock out, destruction of public property, closure of banks and ATM, disturbing customer service etc .
It is ridiculous that those politicians in India suggest dialogue with naxalites and terrorists but never try to solve the problem from the root before it takes violent form. The said agreement was also signed after agitation and strike done by bank employees many times during preceding 30 months. It is sad that a few greedy leaders, I say hardly 10 persons spoilt the career and fate of 10 lac employees.
When king is Tuglak, everything is possible. When Koda is Chief Minister of a state, everything is possible. When IAS officers are like Mr Rathod, murder of innocent girl like Ruchika is not surprising. When person like Raju is CMD of Satyam computers, when CAs are dishonest certification of fake balance sheet is not impossible in India and similarly when CAs are corrupt, rating agencies rate on the basis and quantum of bribe and fees they get, happening of fraud or manipulation with balance sheet is not impossible for banks and I it is not astonishing to anyone in India at least.
I submit a copy of letter written by one retired officer.
The Editor,
Business Line
Dear Sir,
Stalemate over banking consensus
Queer banking equations implanted in the Pension Agreement signed along with ninth bipartite settlement attracted nationwide resentment among bank men, delaying its implementation indefinitely. A group of dissatisfied employees secured stay order from Madras High Court putting IBA and bank unions in the defense box. When they merely objected the recovery of a portion of their pay as contribution to Pension Fund for giving them entry to Pension Scheme, the long cherished desire of the retired to get pension is delayed further, adding to their more than a decade old sufferings. The irrational terms providing for recovery of 2.8 time revised pay from new entrants in respected of the employees on rolls as on the date of agreement (27 April, 2010), recovery of 156 percent CPF and interest paid at the time of retirement in respect of the retired, &nbs p; forfeiture of pension from the date of retirement to the arbitrary date of 27 November, 2009 to the retired, payment of commutation reckoning the age as on date of fresh option instead of the age of retirement, non inclusion of resigned employees who have qualifying service for Pension etc . are tools devised to take away huge sums from the prospective beneficiaries of Pension Scheme. ; It becomes wild justice, quite illegal and irrational, in the context of the Pension Regulations being one and the same as on the date of agreement and existing Pension Opted employees have derived the benefit without any levy or penalty. &nbs p; While addressing the anomaly of denying the social security benefit to a large segment by extending them a fresh chance for option, five fresh glaring anomalies have been infused into the scheme, making it a black agreement altogether.
In earlier Bipartite settlements, after setting apart a portion of the total load factor towards Pension Fund, the remainder alone was distributed among CPF opted and Pension opted, putting the former to erosion of emoluments in each agreement, benefitting the latter. ; The proposal initially mooted for a uniform recovery of 1.6 times revised pay for Nov.2007 from all existing employees for sharing pension costs got changed overnight at last hour, settling down for sharing 2.6 times pay from CPF opted alone to their detriment. &n bsp; The 17.5 percent pay hike in the industry for the six days working bank employees in contrast with the 40 percent settled for five days working government staff has inculcated in them a feeling that it is the result of the additional cost of Pension rather than of the low profile bargaining of Unions. They seem to be ignoring the core fact that Pension is the consideration for services rendered and not for a mere option letter exercised on a bit of paper. While Pension opted are getting some amount as arrears of salary, almost the entire amount is snatched away from the other category. Unions that announced the twin achievement of Wage Revision and Pension Option as a grand gala victory took a somersault saying that they had no option other than agreeing to the rude terms of IBA for securing fresh Pension Option.
Recovery of 156 percent of CPF paid in the case of the retired (up to March 2010) would entail to them huge pecuniary loss as many will have to shell out as much as Rs.15.00 lakhs when their counterpart retiring in April,2010 or afterwards will have to pay a meager sum of Rs.0.30 lakhs to Rs.1.20 lakhs only. The impact of the insignificant cut-off date, which does not appeal to any reasoning is a severe blow to several beneficiaries.
The agreement provides for payment of Pension to the retired from 27th November, 2009 alone irrespective of the date of retirement. Though in all fairness, they are eligible to get monthly pension and interest on each payment date from one decade back, they are victimized through recovery of 156 percent of the CPF paid at the time of retirement uniformly. &n bsp; This apparently is a dual penalty to them. The modality is totally enigmatic and carries with it unfairness of an extreme nature.
Pension Regulations for computing commutation recognizes the age next birthday at the time of retirement whereas the agreement stipulates age on the date of fresh option to the detriment of all the retired. &nbs p; This leads to application of entirely different yardstick under the same Regulations to different beneficiaries without any logic. The delay in implementation of the agreement is worsening the situation for the retired.
Non-inclusion of the resigned employees in the scheme is a further anomaly as the resigned possessing enough qualifying service are denied the social security benefit altogether. & nbsp; When VRS retirees who are paid an incentive for going out are also considered for pension, the resigned are to be invariably extended the benefit in all cases where they are paid all other terminal benefits. Qualifying service and not the mode of exist shall be the vesting criterion for Pension unless the termination if a compulsory one through disciplinary procedures.
In financial sector, Public Sector Banks appear to be competing with others to secure the worst employer award by denying proper compensation to the work force who run the shows for the progress of the nation. Even as profits are soaring for each bank, the key men are attempting to add to their cosmetics by transferring higher profits to the exchequer, which goes to part finance the pension and wages of employees in other sectors and government. They should say what banks would have done if all had opted for pension when initially offered. &nbs p; The deprived could not opt earlier when terms of offer contained a penal clause enabling forfeiture of entire past service for participation in strike and were not given fresh chance when the adverse chapter was scrapped in 1999. While denying pension to the retired, banks that function on sole premises of laws of the country and depend on them for each transaction are blatantly flouting substantive law. Retires and working, Pension Opted and CPF opted all are, without exception, growling over the agreement percolating with gross anomalies. The retired who did their best for banks are on crossroads for want of income for subsistence and their decade old sufferings get prolonged as the stalemate on the catastrophic agreement continues. IBA, Unions and Government should evince keen interest and initiate corrigendum steps to rectify all anomalies without further waste of time and bring solace to all.
Yours faithfully,
C N Venugopalan
C N Venugopalan
Ex-Manager, Union Bank of India
Camp: 101 Pinnacle Court,
Apt. # 82, Frankfort,
Kentucky 40601 USA
Cell:0013135491401
Nandanam,
Please do not kill the voice coming from your own heart and mind. None of the respectable, wise, experienced, intelligent , talented, law abiding , and knowledgeable person in the banking industry of lawyers club of India will concur with injustice done to Non pension optees through the 9th Bipartite settlement
Since courts are slow, you cannot perpetuate reign of injustice in wage agreement for long as you are doing injustice in promotion processes and transfer decisions and employees of India cannot allow you to use discriminatory and divisive wage scale defying fundamental Laws of equality enshrined in Indian Constitution.
Various letters have been written to important dignitaries of the country in this regard by so many persons working in different banks. But unfortunately politicians of our country also do not understand the problem of victims for years and years, decades ad decades as long as there is mass movement, violent agitation arsoning, strike, lock out, destruction of public property, closure of banks and ATM, disturbing customer service etc .
It is ridiculous that those politicians in India suggest dialogue with naxalites and terrorists but never try to solve the problem from the root before it takes violent form. The said agreement was also signed after agitation and strike done by bank employees many times during preceding 30 months. It is sad that a few greedy leaders, I say hardly 10 persons spoilt the career and fate of 10 lac employees.
When king is Tuglak, everything is possible. When Koda is Chief Minister of a state, everything is possible. When IAS officers are like Mr Rathod, murder of innocent girl like Ruchika is not surprising. When person like Raju is CMD of Satyam computers, when CAs are dishonest certification of fake balance sheet is not impossible in India and similarly when CAs are corrupt, rating agencies rate on the basis and quantum of bribe and fees they get, happening of fraud or manipulation with balance sheet is not impossible for banks and I it is not astonishing to anyone in India at least.
I submit a copy of letter written by one retired officer.
The Editor,
Business Line
Dear Sir,
Stalemate over banking consensus
Queer banking equations implanted in the Pension Agreement signed along with ninth bipartite settlement attracted nationwide resentment among bank men, delaying its implementation indefinitely. A group of dissatisfied employees secured stay order from Madras High Court putting IBA and bank unions in the defense box. When they merely objected the recovery of a portion of their pay as contribution to Pension Fund for giving them entry to Pension Scheme, the long cherished desire of the retired to get pension is delayed further, adding to their more than a decade old sufferings. The irrational terms providing for recovery of 2.8 time revised pay from new entrants in respected of the employees on rolls as on the date of agreement (27 April, 2010), recovery of 156 percent CPF and interest paid at the time of retirement in respect of the retired, &nbs p; forfeiture of pension from the date of retirement to the arbitrary date of 27 November, 2009 to the retired, payment of commutation reckoning the age as on date of fresh option instead of the age of retirement, non inclusion of resigned employees who have qualifying service for Pension etc . are tools devised to take away huge sums from the prospective beneficiaries of Pension Scheme. ; It becomes wild justice, quite illegal and irrational, in the context of the Pension Regulations being one and the same as on the date of agreement and existing Pension Opted employees have derived the benefit without any levy or penalty. &nbs p; While addressing the anomaly of denying the social security benefit to a large segment by extending them a fresh chance for option, five fresh glaring anomalies have been infused into the scheme, making it a black agreement altogether.
In earlier Bipartite settlements, after setting apart a portion of the total load factor towards Pension Fund, the remainder alone was distributed among CPF opted and Pension opted, putting the former to erosion of emoluments in each agreement, benefitting the latter. ; The proposal initially mooted for a uniform recovery of 1.6 times revised pay for Nov.2007 from all existing employees for sharing pension costs got changed overnight at last hour, settling down for sharing 2.6 times pay from CPF opted alone to their detriment. &n bsp; The 17.5 percent pay hike in the industry for the six days working bank employees in contrast with the 40 percent settled for five days working government staff has inculcated in them a feeling that it is the result of the additional cost of Pension rather than of the low profile bargaining of Unions. They seem to be ignoring the core fact that Pension is the consideration for services rendered and not for a mere option letter exercised on a bit of paper. While Pension opted are getting some amount as arrears of salary, almost the entire amount is snatched away from the other category. Unions that announced the twin achievement of Wage Revision and Pension Option as a grand gala victory took a somersault saying that they had no option other than agreeing to the rude terms of IBA for securing fresh Pension Option.
Recovery of 156 percent of CPF paid in the case of the retired (up to March 2010) would entail to them huge pecuniary loss as many will have to shell out as much as Rs.15.00 lakhs when their counterpart retiring in April,2010 or afterwards will have to pay a meager sum of Rs.0.30 lakhs to Rs.1.20 lakhs only. The impact of the insignificant cut-off date, which does not appeal to any reasoning is a severe blow to several beneficiaries.
The agreement provides for payment of Pension to the retired from 27th November, 2009 alone irrespective of the date of retirement. Though in all fairness, they are eligible to get monthly pension and interest on each payment date from one decade back, they are victimized through recovery of 156 percent of the CPF paid at the time of retirement uniformly. &n bsp; This apparently is a dual penalty to them. The modality is totally enigmatic and carries with it unfairness of an extreme nature.
Pension Regulations for computing commutation recognizes the age next birthday at the time of retirement whereas the agreement stipulates age on the date of fresh option to the detriment of all the retired. &nbs p; This leads to application of entirely different yardstick under the same Regulations to different beneficiaries without any logic. The delay in implementation of the agreement is worsening the situation for the retired.
Non-inclusion of the resigned employees in the scheme is a further anomaly as the resigned possessing enough qualifying service are denied the social security benefit altogether. & nbsp; When VRS retirees who are paid an incentive for going out are also considered for pension, the resigned are to be invariably extended the benefit in all cases where they are paid all other terminal benefits. Qualifying service and not the mode of exist shall be the vesting criterion for Pension unless the termination if a compulsory one through disciplinary procedures.
In financial sector, Public Sector Banks appear to be competing with others to secure the worst employer award by denying proper compensation to the work force who run the shows for the progress of the nation. Even as profits are soaring for each bank, the key men are attempting to add to their cosmetics by transferring higher profits to the exchequer, which goes to part finance the pension and wages of employees in other sectors and government. They should say what banks would have done if all had opted for pension when initially offered. &nbs p; The deprived could not opt earlier when terms of offer contained a penal clause enabling forfeiture of entire past service for participation in strike and were not given fresh chance when the adverse chapter was scrapped in 1999. While denying pension to the retired, banks that function on sole premises of laws of the country and depend on them for each transaction are blatantly flouting substantive law. Retires and working, Pension Opted and CPF opted all are, without exception, growling over the agreement percolating with gross anomalies. The retired who did their best for banks are on crossroads for want of income for subsistence and their decade old sufferings get prolonged as the stalemate on the catastrophic agreement continues. IBA, Unions and Government should evince keen interest and initiate corrigendum steps to rectify all anomalies without further waste of time and bring solace to all.
Yours faithfully,
C N Venugopalan
C N Venugopalan
Ex-Manager, Union Bank of India
Camp: 101 Pinnacle Court,
Apt. # 82, Frankfort,
Kentucky 40601 USA
Cell:0013135491401
Nandanam,
Friday, July 16, 2010
Karamchari Ekta Zindabad Zindabad
How many Banks have obeyed the stay order of Madras High Court and not recovered 2.8 times of November 2007 salary from PF optees?
How many banks have not yet started paying arrears as per 9th BPS.?
How many banks have issued pension offer till date and if not why have they recovered from PF optees? Already three months are likely to complete after the date of settlement. Why bank is so slow on the issue of pension offer and so fast on the matter of recovery and similarly why union leaders are so anxious on recovery of levy of Rs.3000/ from their members and not worried for delay in offer of pension? Union leaders are getting farewell gift of five lacs or ten lacs on their retirement from Union Fund. Is this the way to use hard earned contribution made to Unions and Associations by poorly paid bank employees?
Days are not far when union leaders will distribute accumulated union levy amounting to hundreds of crores of rupees among themselves and ask for separate fee if they fight for any aggrieved employee. Are union leaders not more dangerous than our management bosses? I say this because union leaders have threatened to expel officer from their association if they do not pay union levy of Rs.3000/ on account of so called successful historic agreement. Management never dared to issue dismissal threatening to officer employee if they fail to obey any instruction of boss.
Why are employees keeping mum on illegitimate recovery and bent upon getting arrear at the earliest even if it is discriminatory? Why are they afraid of even lodging their protest before accepting arrear payment?
Bank management has signed a historic victory agreement when they have vertically divided the employees in two segments and created an unbridgeable split in banking unity and created dilution in their intensity to fight against the reign of injustice perpetuated by management.
And Bank union leaders on the contrary has committed a historic blunder by signing a discriminatory and divisive agreement on 27.04.2010 for some or the other vested interest and clearly betrayed the cause of unity for which they used to struggle under the banner of communist parties.
At least pension optees are now in support of the agreement. It hardly matters to most of them how loudly PF optees cries and weeps though in the past they all always used to be on the same platform and UFBU was also formed for the same purpose. Banking unity was an example in the community of labour class or working class.
Banks are not in the grip of flatterers. Those who are yes-men are getting timely promotion and getting best posting and in this way a team of flatterers are generated by bank management who blindly support of all action of the management right or wrong. Even union leaders do not fight against such lollipop like promotions and transfers because they say that ultimately their members are getting promotions and cream posting or choice posting though the same may be at the cost of others genuine right. At least veteran union leaders are enjoying posting in Metros and capital towns, they need not perform bank’s job, they may do their side business, they may take share from dirty dealings in credit decision or contract offers corruption and they may get sweet request from corrupt officers for reduction of punishment and so on. Lastly they may get huge gifts from top branch managers, big bribe earners, big customers and last but not the least huge money from union fund on their retirement and on attending an inquiry from Union Fund. Similarly union leaders now plead that the said agreement is good in the light of social security though they know and understand from the core of their heart that recovery from PF optees is not justified from any angle of consideration.
This is called divide and rule policy. Intelligent, talented, experienced, valued and visionary leaders of bank management who occupy the important seats of core committee of IBM as also that of United Forum of Bank Unions are very well aware and they all realize from the core of their heart that injustice has occurred with PF optees, retirees and those who have resigned. They all know very well that courts cannot deliver justice in decades and decades and this is why they are least bothered of courts also. They have gained sufficient experience by giving undue promotions to even charge sheeted officers and by rejecting even good officers. In every circular enlisting name of officers getting promotion they used to mention “subject to court decisions on various writs going on in various courts”
In the same way IBA is bent upon making recovery from PF optees subject to court decisions. But at the same time God knows whether they will issue pension offer or not. Reason for not issuing pension offer, bank will say they are waiting decision from courts. It is not surprising at least for me that even so called union leaders are also keeping mum on this matter for which they feel proud and say that the agreement is historic.
Bank Unity Zindabad?
How many banks have not yet started paying arrears as per 9th BPS.?
How many banks have issued pension offer till date and if not why have they recovered from PF optees? Already three months are likely to complete after the date of settlement. Why bank is so slow on the issue of pension offer and so fast on the matter of recovery and similarly why union leaders are so anxious on recovery of levy of Rs.3000/ from their members and not worried for delay in offer of pension? Union leaders are getting farewell gift of five lacs or ten lacs on their retirement from Union Fund. Is this the way to use hard earned contribution made to Unions and Associations by poorly paid bank employees?
Days are not far when union leaders will distribute accumulated union levy amounting to hundreds of crores of rupees among themselves and ask for separate fee if they fight for any aggrieved employee. Are union leaders not more dangerous than our management bosses? I say this because union leaders have threatened to expel officer from their association if they do not pay union levy of Rs.3000/ on account of so called successful historic agreement. Management never dared to issue dismissal threatening to officer employee if they fail to obey any instruction of boss.
Why are employees keeping mum on illegitimate recovery and bent upon getting arrear at the earliest even if it is discriminatory? Why are they afraid of even lodging their protest before accepting arrear payment?
Bank management has signed a historic victory agreement when they have vertically divided the employees in two segments and created an unbridgeable split in banking unity and created dilution in their intensity to fight against the reign of injustice perpetuated by management.
And Bank union leaders on the contrary has committed a historic blunder by signing a discriminatory and divisive agreement on 27.04.2010 for some or the other vested interest and clearly betrayed the cause of unity for which they used to struggle under the banner of communist parties.
At least pension optees are now in support of the agreement. It hardly matters to most of them how loudly PF optees cries and weeps though in the past they all always used to be on the same platform and UFBU was also formed for the same purpose. Banking unity was an example in the community of labour class or working class.
Banks are not in the grip of flatterers. Those who are yes-men are getting timely promotion and getting best posting and in this way a team of flatterers are generated by bank management who blindly support of all action of the management right or wrong. Even union leaders do not fight against such lollipop like promotions and transfers because they say that ultimately their members are getting promotions and cream posting or choice posting though the same may be at the cost of others genuine right. At least veteran union leaders are enjoying posting in Metros and capital towns, they need not perform bank’s job, they may do their side business, they may take share from dirty dealings in credit decision or contract offers corruption and they may get sweet request from corrupt officers for reduction of punishment and so on. Lastly they may get huge gifts from top branch managers, big bribe earners, big customers and last but not the least huge money from union fund on their retirement and on attending an inquiry from Union Fund. Similarly union leaders now plead that the said agreement is good in the light of social security though they know and understand from the core of their heart that recovery from PF optees is not justified from any angle of consideration.
This is called divide and rule policy. Intelligent, talented, experienced, valued and visionary leaders of bank management who occupy the important seats of core committee of IBM as also that of United Forum of Bank Unions are very well aware and they all realize from the core of their heart that injustice has occurred with PF optees, retirees and those who have resigned. They all know very well that courts cannot deliver justice in decades and decades and this is why they are least bothered of courts also. They have gained sufficient experience by giving undue promotions to even charge sheeted officers and by rejecting even good officers. In every circular enlisting name of officers getting promotion they used to mention “subject to court decisions on various writs going on in various courts”
In the same way IBA is bent upon making recovery from PF optees subject to court decisions. But at the same time God knows whether they will issue pension offer or not. Reason for not issuing pension offer, bank will say they are waiting decision from courts. It is not surprising at least for me that even so called union leaders are also keeping mum on this matter for which they feel proud and say that the agreement is historic.
Bank Unity Zindabad?
Friday, July 09, 2010
IBA files an affidavit in Madras High Court
IBA in its affidavit has stressed on the point that the trade union representing 95% of bank employees signed the agreement and hence Canara Bank petition filed by a union representing only 244 members should be ignored is not acceptable to any one who believes in justice.
Suppose if majority union decides that female employees will be given three increments less than male employees though they male and female perform same duty in the bank. , Can such unconstitutional agreement be treated as valid only because the same has been signed by a union representing majority of members?
Are we living in a jungle of sheep?
Another point is that the disputed agreement was signed by leaders of majority union. If leaders become victim of management, if leaders become hostile to members due to self interest, if leader’s intention become malicious there is all possibility to betray the interest of members. There is country wide protest and several writs have been filed in various courts of the country against the disputed clause which shows that the said agreement signed by leaders of majority union is not liked by majority of memers.
When late Indira Gandhi, exPrime Minister of India lost her temper, she lost her conscience, she put all her opponents in jail, imposed emergency and without any fear of legal consequences or political reaction she misused the majority of her party in the Parliament to change the basic structure of the constitution. Similarly IBA has divided the bank employees in two segments, one pension optee and another PF optee and there is no doubt that bank management will use this division for imposing illegal recovery on PF optees. To add fuel to fire, IBA has created division even among various union leaders. This is why powerful protest against illegal recovery is not visible and management is taking advantage of this division and submitting illogical plea in the court to defend the discriminatory clause of the Bipartite Settlement. Those employees who are raising voices against misrule of IBA and union leaders are facing threatening of transfer or rejection in promotion process or posting at critical place or transfer from east to west or from north to south. Obviously reign on injustice will continue unabated until courts impose some punitive action against erring officials and leaders.
One more point raised by IBA in their affidavit filed in Madras High Court is that the second option of pension is not mandatory and employee at his will to opt or not to opt for pension. Days are not far when bank will curtail salary of all employees by 50% and give option to employee to continue in service or leave the job. In the initial offer for pension bank did not put any condition and hence there is no logic to put condition of recovery in the present offer of pension.
Union leaders have got no right to damage career of any individual or cause financial loss to any single person, not to speak of 3 lacs employees PF optees. When PF optees have also contributed in pension fund along with pension optees in the past during preceeding Bipartite Settlement, there is no question of making recovery this time only from PF optees only to bridge the gap of 1800 crores.
When these union leaders called for strike or agitational programme, the same was put in action by all the employees including PF optees and not by PF or pension optees alone. Never in the past, had these union leaders ever told that second option for PF optees will be purchased by paying three months salary to pension fund. Had it been so there was no need to wait for 15 to 17 years, it could have been easily offered by PBA in 1995 itself.
When union leaders and IBA both had unanimous view of 1.6 times recovery and they have expressed the same in their separate affidavits, what happened during last two three days that both parties changed their view and agreed for recovery from only PF optees. Such discriminatory agreement pass the test of existing laws and the provision of constitutionally granted fundamental right called as Equality before law.
Already bank management has been violating spirit of transfer policy and promotion policy just to please union leaders and to conceal the misdeeds of corrupt executives. Management even do not hesitate to compromise lending policy or ethics behind waiver or comprise settlement with willful defaulters.
80% of officers belonging to the state of Jharkhand, Bihar,Orrisa and a few other states are posted outside their parent state and transferred whimsically frequently whereas those of the state of Maharashtra, Tamilnadu and West Bengal are seldom transferred outside their state for three decades and more. In the name of exigencies of work officers are transferred from one corner to other in clear cut violation of transfer policy. Similarly in the name of interview in promotion processes, higher management in nexus with union leaders promote or reject officers as per their sweet will and thus perpetuating arbitrary rule and reign of injustice.
Now they have jointly committed fraud with PF optees, they have cheated PF optees, they have extended biased benefits to scale four officers at the cost of junior level officers, they have caused loss to senior officers by stagnating them and depriving them of annual increments and what not.......
How long such cruelty will be tolerated is a million dollar question?
How long top executives and CEOs forming IBA will kill their own conscience and commit unethical acts and work against all moral values. I ask IBA team leaders and veteran trade union leaders whether core of their heart permits such divisive and discriminatory agreement .
Suppose if majority union decides that female employees will be given three increments less than male employees though they male and female perform same duty in the bank. , Can such unconstitutional agreement be treated as valid only because the same has been signed by a union representing majority of members?
Are we living in a jungle of sheep?
Another point is that the disputed agreement was signed by leaders of majority union. If leaders become victim of management, if leaders become hostile to members due to self interest, if leader’s intention become malicious there is all possibility to betray the interest of members. There is country wide protest and several writs have been filed in various courts of the country against the disputed clause which shows that the said agreement signed by leaders of majority union is not liked by majority of memers.
When late Indira Gandhi, exPrime Minister of India lost her temper, she lost her conscience, she put all her opponents in jail, imposed emergency and without any fear of legal consequences or political reaction she misused the majority of her party in the Parliament to change the basic structure of the constitution. Similarly IBA has divided the bank employees in two segments, one pension optee and another PF optee and there is no doubt that bank management will use this division for imposing illegal recovery on PF optees. To add fuel to fire, IBA has created division even among various union leaders. This is why powerful protest against illegal recovery is not visible and management is taking advantage of this division and submitting illogical plea in the court to defend the discriminatory clause of the Bipartite Settlement. Those employees who are raising voices against misrule of IBA and union leaders are facing threatening of transfer or rejection in promotion process or posting at critical place or transfer from east to west or from north to south. Obviously reign on injustice will continue unabated until courts impose some punitive action against erring officials and leaders.
One more point raised by IBA in their affidavit filed in Madras High Court is that the second option of pension is not mandatory and employee at his will to opt or not to opt for pension. Days are not far when bank will curtail salary of all employees by 50% and give option to employee to continue in service or leave the job. In the initial offer for pension bank did not put any condition and hence there is no logic to put condition of recovery in the present offer of pension.
Union leaders have got no right to damage career of any individual or cause financial loss to any single person, not to speak of 3 lacs employees PF optees. When PF optees have also contributed in pension fund along with pension optees in the past during preceeding Bipartite Settlement, there is no question of making recovery this time only from PF optees only to bridge the gap of 1800 crores.
When these union leaders called for strike or agitational programme, the same was put in action by all the employees including PF optees and not by PF or pension optees alone. Never in the past, had these union leaders ever told that second option for PF optees will be purchased by paying three months salary to pension fund. Had it been so there was no need to wait for 15 to 17 years, it could have been easily offered by PBA in 1995 itself.
When union leaders and IBA both had unanimous view of 1.6 times recovery and they have expressed the same in their separate affidavits, what happened during last two three days that both parties changed their view and agreed for recovery from only PF optees. Such discriminatory agreement pass the test of existing laws and the provision of constitutionally granted fundamental right called as Equality before law.
Already bank management has been violating spirit of transfer policy and promotion policy just to please union leaders and to conceal the misdeeds of corrupt executives. Management even do not hesitate to compromise lending policy or ethics behind waiver or comprise settlement with willful defaulters.
80% of officers belonging to the state of Jharkhand, Bihar,Orrisa and a few other states are posted outside their parent state and transferred whimsically frequently whereas those of the state of Maharashtra, Tamilnadu and West Bengal are seldom transferred outside their state for three decades and more. In the name of exigencies of work officers are transferred from one corner to other in clear cut violation of transfer policy. Similarly in the name of interview in promotion processes, higher management in nexus with union leaders promote or reject officers as per their sweet will and thus perpetuating arbitrary rule and reign of injustice.
Now they have jointly committed fraud with PF optees, they have cheated PF optees, they have extended biased benefits to scale four officers at the cost of junior level officers, they have caused loss to senior officers by stagnating them and depriving them of annual increments and what not.......
How long such cruelty will be tolerated is a million dollar question?
How long top executives and CEOs forming IBA will kill their own conscience and commit unethical acts and work against all moral values. I ask IBA team leaders and veteran trade union leaders whether core of their heart permits such divisive and discriminatory agreement .
Wednesday, July 07, 2010
Rakchak hi bhakchak ban gaye Madras High Court me
This refers to 9th bipartite settlement signed by Banks and Trade union leaders of bank employees on 27th April 2010 which contains a lot of divisive and discriminatory clauses. Writs have been filed in various high courts against the said settlement and Madras High Court has even granted interim stay on illegal and unjustified recovery from PF opteees who have been given a second chance to switch over to pension optees segment of employees in the said agreement. Contesting defendants in the court called as AIBEA or AIBOC have filed an affidavit that they represent majority of employees and tried to justify the disputed clause on this plea.
Are AIBEA or AIBOC representing 90% of employees entitled to introduce any whimsical clause in Bipartite Settlement, frame any whimsical policy or sign any illegal agreement even if it violates the existing book of laws, spirit of the Constitution, fundamental right of equality before law?
It appears to me as if majority of employees have empowered union leaders to do whatever suits to them. This is why they are negotiating with the management on posting, transfer of their friends, relatives, and flatterers, reducing punishment of their corrupt colleagues and similarly recommending promotion of officers through members of Interview panel. Union leaders are godfather of 90% of employees and hence they are blackmailing with the management on waiver of big loans and taking their share in the cake. They are all in all for majority of employees and hence they have shut their eyes on manipulation carried out by the management in balance sheets, turned their blind eyes on shortage of manpower in branches, whimsical transfers of a good number of good officers to remote places , prevailing corrupt practices in loans and advances, rampant corruption in contractual works undertaken by banks to open branches, ATMs or in renovation work, transfer of employees, promotion of employees and so on..........................
But court do not consider this fact whether a union represents 90 % of employee or 9% of employees. Even if one person is cheated by bank management, court is not supposed to accept the logic of Trade Union leaders only because they represent majority of employees. Indian courts are not guided by heard of sheep. Courts decide the matter on the merit of the issue and not on the number of persons supporting the issue. Court test the issue from the angle of existing laws and not on he basis of momentum of crown backing the issue.
Late Indira Gandhi changed the basic structure of Indian Constitution in perhaps 1976 when her own vested interest was defeated by her opponent Raj Narayan and when she thought that her post of Prime Minister was at risk. She imposed emergency and promoted all types of excesses through her flatterers. Even bachelors were forced to pass through family planning operation. No doubt Indira Gandhi perpetuated her reign of injustice for a year or two because she was in power and a team of flatterers was backing her.
But the anger of victim people aggravated and turned into a movement against her. With the support of leadership of Jai Prakash Narayan she was removed, she was defeated in the election, she had to face huge humiliation and at a later date even the Apex court set aside the 42nd amendment.
Similarly reign of injustice will prevail in banking industry as long as our protectors are corrupt and the so called trade union leaders in disguise of saviors are working in nexus with top officials of management for their self interest. Reign of injustice is continuing uninterrupted only because it takes two or three decades in getting judgment from Indian courts. Whimsical transfers and arbitrary promotions are taking place year after year only because top officials know that the victim cannot go to court for justice in fear of high cost and repercussion from the bank management.
But they should keep in mind that days are not far when three lac employees called as PF optees who are the greatest sufferer of the said Bipartite Settlement will turn the tide against the management and the so called leaders of Tread unions too.
Rules are made for justice and they cannot be violated by a crowd of miscreants only because they represent majority of residents in the locality. A group of flatterers cannot be allowed to hijack the laws of land only because they are in power or they represent majority of employees.
Last but not the least, It will not be exaggeration to say that this team of flatterers will not only break the heart of true workers in the banking industry but will also badly affect the health of bank, intrinsic value of the bank, demotivate the work force and what not.......
Team of flatterers has committed a historic blunder in the said Bipartite Settlement and they will never be excused by any law abiding person. Divisive and discriminatory approach of such flatterers will be exposed sooner or later.
………………..Keep patience. I am very much confident that voice of inner conscience will prevail upon the madness and devilous egoism currently in the minds of union leaders and top CEOs of top banks.
Are AIBEA or AIBOC representing 90% of employees entitled to introduce any whimsical clause in Bipartite Settlement, frame any whimsical policy or sign any illegal agreement even if it violates the existing book of laws, spirit of the Constitution, fundamental right of equality before law?
It appears to me as if majority of employees have empowered union leaders to do whatever suits to them. This is why they are negotiating with the management on posting, transfer of their friends, relatives, and flatterers, reducing punishment of their corrupt colleagues and similarly recommending promotion of officers through members of Interview panel. Union leaders are godfather of 90% of employees and hence they are blackmailing with the management on waiver of big loans and taking their share in the cake. They are all in all for majority of employees and hence they have shut their eyes on manipulation carried out by the management in balance sheets, turned their blind eyes on shortage of manpower in branches, whimsical transfers of a good number of good officers to remote places , prevailing corrupt practices in loans and advances, rampant corruption in contractual works undertaken by banks to open branches, ATMs or in renovation work, transfer of employees, promotion of employees and so on..........................
But court do not consider this fact whether a union represents 90 % of employee or 9% of employees. Even if one person is cheated by bank management, court is not supposed to accept the logic of Trade Union leaders only because they represent majority of employees. Indian courts are not guided by heard of sheep. Courts decide the matter on the merit of the issue and not on the number of persons supporting the issue. Court test the issue from the angle of existing laws and not on he basis of momentum of crown backing the issue.
Late Indira Gandhi changed the basic structure of Indian Constitution in perhaps 1976 when her own vested interest was defeated by her opponent Raj Narayan and when she thought that her post of Prime Minister was at risk. She imposed emergency and promoted all types of excesses through her flatterers. Even bachelors were forced to pass through family planning operation. No doubt Indira Gandhi perpetuated her reign of injustice for a year or two because she was in power and a team of flatterers was backing her.
But the anger of victim people aggravated and turned into a movement against her. With the support of leadership of Jai Prakash Narayan she was removed, she was defeated in the election, she had to face huge humiliation and at a later date even the Apex court set aside the 42nd amendment.
Similarly reign of injustice will prevail in banking industry as long as our protectors are corrupt and the so called trade union leaders in disguise of saviors are working in nexus with top officials of management for their self interest. Reign of injustice is continuing uninterrupted only because it takes two or three decades in getting judgment from Indian courts. Whimsical transfers and arbitrary promotions are taking place year after year only because top officials know that the victim cannot go to court for justice in fear of high cost and repercussion from the bank management.
But they should keep in mind that days are not far when three lac employees called as PF optees who are the greatest sufferer of the said Bipartite Settlement will turn the tide against the management and the so called leaders of Tread unions too.
Rules are made for justice and they cannot be violated by a crowd of miscreants only because they represent majority of residents in the locality. A group of flatterers cannot be allowed to hijack the laws of land only because they are in power or they represent majority of employees.
Last but not the least, It will not be exaggeration to say that this team of flatterers will not only break the heart of true workers in the banking industry but will also badly affect the health of bank, intrinsic value of the bank, demotivate the work force and what not.......
Team of flatterers has committed a historic blunder in the said Bipartite Settlement and they will never be excused by any law abiding person. Divisive and discriminatory approach of such flatterers will be exposed sooner or later.
………………..Keep patience. I am very much confident that voice of inner conscience will prevail upon the madness and devilous egoism currently in the minds of union leaders and top CEOs of top banks.
Saturday, July 03, 2010
Indian bank Association
"Asli Chehra" - TRUE FACE OF BANK UNIONS
Immediately after the settlement, most of the unions patted their back for the so called "historic settlement". Slowly as they started facing volley of questions from the members, they came out with various theories to justify their action, which included the so called legal opinion and IBA's stiff attitude which forced them to agree to recovery from only PF optees to the tune of 2.8 times of the November 2007 pay. An impression was being created by them as if they were not in favour the same till 26th April, 2010, but somehow they were cornered so much that they had to agree to the terms set by IBA. If that would have been the case, then they would not now oppose the petition pending in Madras High Court. That shows the double standards.
But soon the bankers will be able to see the "Asli Chehra" (i.e. True Face) of these union leaders. These union leaders will now not be able to beat around the bush and befool the members by shedding crocodile tears. They have to take a stand in the Madras High Court, as to whether they are in favour of payment by all employees / officers @ 1.6 times or they favour 2.8 times only from PF optees. Some of these unions have already been exposed. Let us see what does the market reports say as at the end of June, 2010.
It is reported that during the course of hearing of the case at Madras High Court, while opposing the interim stay granted by Madras High Court, advocates of IBA, and AIBEA and NCBE, requested for vacation of the stay. AIBEA and NCBE were represented by one of the top most firm namely M/s Aiyar & Dolia and wanted vacation of the interim stay on recovery of 2.8 times only from PF optees to be vacated. So the stands of these two unions are very clear now. They will be using the members’ funds (including PF optees) for payment to the law firms and fighting case against them. However, the Hon’ble Judge advised them to file their counter affidavits and Ordered continuation of the Stay Order. Next hearing has been fixed for 6th July 2010.
Vide circular No. 98 dated 29th June, 2010. AIBOC has declared "We are in constant touch with the IBA and the Convenor of UFBU, to initiate appropriate steps to vacate the stay, at the earliest, to enable IBA to issue necessary instructions to member Banks on the Pension offer". Thus, AIBOC is also likely to oppose the move and appears to be in favour of payment by only PF optees".
(Remember, the stay is not against the Pension offer or issuing circular by IBA, it is only against immediate recovery of 2.8 times of pay of November, 2007 from PF optees. )
The stand of other unions will also be clear within a week, as court in its orders says ""Notice to respondents returnable by 06.07.2010. There shall be an interim order of stay". (all major unions are respondents in this case). The reports indicate that NOBW may support the petition filed by Canara Bank Workers Unions. Similarly, BEFI may not oppose the petition of Canara Bank Workers union. The protest by INBEF has already been incorporated in the affidavit filed in the Court.
If the above reports are true, then 29th June 2010 would be regarded as a sad day in the history of trade union movement of Banking Industry. Souls of great leaders like Parawana Ji would be feeling really sad and dejected.
Till now they have been propagating that they have been forced by the circumstances and situation to accept contributory pension scheme in banking industry. They are giving so many logics and have been pleading as to why they could not make IBA agree to the Pension Scheme in its original form of 1993. We are unable to find any logical reason from Unions wherein it joined hands with the union of the Management i.e. IBA to defeat the efforts of bank employees.
Duniya ke Mazdooron ek ho - Duniya ke mehanatkashon ek ho ka naara laagene waale aaj majdooron ke khilaf hi Court main jaa pahunche.
TESTING TIME IS NOT FAR WAY NOW. NOW THESE UNION LEADERS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SAY THAT IBA DID NOT LET THEM SUFFICIENT TIME AND CORNERED THEM SO SUCH THAT THEY SIGNED THE SETTLEMENT ON 27TH APRIL, 2010. THEY HAVE SUFFICIENT TIME OF OVER A WEEK TO DECIDE WHETHER THEY WANT TO PROTECT THE INTERESTS OF PF OPTEES OR WANT TO DO WHAT IBA IS SAYING.
It has also been reported that some Banks have issued strict instructions for payment of arrears to all the employees / officers by 30th June, 2010 or so, after keeping 2.8 times of the pay of November, 2007 in suspense account. This clearly gives an indication that banks are in a hurry to pay arrears so that they can deduct 2.8 times from the arrears of PF optees before orders of Madras High Court are delivered to them through IBA. In court they will take the plea that notice of stay was not received by them and arrears have already been paid. As Canara Bank has also rushed to pay the arrears today after keeping the 2.8 recovery in suspense, Canara Bank Workers Union is likely to give a strong protest letter on 1st July, 2010 at their Head Office. Canara Bank Workers Union has informed that they are proceeding to Bangalore to personally handover the letter along with a copy of the court order and get the acknowledgement.
Now all the bankers have to take a final call as to whether these union leaders are with the workers or are working against them. We know it is a difficult task as they have to eat their own words. They have issued number of circulars justifying as to why and how they were cornered to agree this changed stand on the night of 26th and 27th April, 2010. However, this is the time when they can correct the mistakes as PF optees have shared the burden of pension even in the last two Bipartite settlements (7th and 8th). This information is now shared by almost everybody (which was not known earlier to 99% of the PF optees).
The unions opposing the petition will be spending lacs of rupees in the legal battle. All this money can be saved if they simple say that we do not oppose the petition and are in favour of the same.
LET PF OPTEES DECLARE THAT THEY WILL QUITE THEIR UNION (WHICHEVER IT MAY BE) IF THEIR UNION OPPOSES THE PETITION FILED BY CANARA BANK WORKERS UNION AT MADRAS HIGH COURT. LET COURT DECIDE THE CASE ON MERITS.
(Inputs also by kamlesh.chaturvedi@yahoo.com; canara bank workers unions etc )
UPDATE ON THE ORDERS ISSUED BY VARIOUS HIGH COURTS AGAINST RECOVERY OF 2.8 TIMES OF NOVEMBER 2007 PAY
In order to ventilate the grievances of the employees, Writ Petitions have been filed in various Hon’ble High Courts.
(A)The First Writ Petition was filed before the Hon’ble Andhra High Court bearing number Writ Petition No. 8237 of 2010 where in Hon’ble Court has passed following orders:
“ORDER: Interim order dated 13-04-2010, to continue, subject to final orders to be passed in this WPMP. Any settlement also, shall be subject to final orders in this WPMP.
Post after Summer Vacation, 2010.”
(B) Writ Petition No. (C) No.3729/2010 has been filed before Hon’ble Delhi High Court, where Hon’ble Court has passed following Orders on 28.05.2010:
“Issue notice to the respondents to show cause as to why rule nisi
be not issued, returnable on 30.07.2010. Necessary steps be taken within seven
days.”
(C) Subsequently, Division Bench of Hon’ble Allahabad High Court while disposing Special Appeal No. 947 of 2010 passed following orders Orders:
“Issue notice.
Respondents are allowed three weeks time to file counter
Affidavit.
List thereafter”
(D) And now recently a Writ Petition bearing no. WP 12269/2010 has been filed before Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras, in the matter of Clause No. 32 of the industry level Wage Revision Settlement dated 27.04.2010 and also clause (1) of the Pension Settlement of even date, seeking a direction from the Hon’ble Court to quash the above clauses only in so far as the said clauses require the provident fund optees now in service to contribute 2.8 times of the Nov 2007 revised pay, if they want to opt for the pension scheme.
Hon’ble Justice K Venkataraman, who heard the matter has ordered an interim stay and the next date of hearing, has been fixed on 06 July 2010. A copy of this order is enclosed.
From what is stated here in above, it is evidently clear that Clause 32 of Settlement dated 27.04.2010 and Clause (1) of Pension Settlement dated 27.04.2010 has become subject matter of judicial scrutiny by the Hon’ble Courts and Hon’ble Madras High Court has passed orders to stay the operation of these clauses.
Immediately after the settlement, most of the unions patted their back for the so called "historic settlement". Slowly as they started facing volley of questions from the members, they came out with various theories to justify their action, which included the so called legal opinion and IBA's stiff attitude which forced them to agree to recovery from only PF optees to the tune of 2.8 times of the November 2007 pay. An impression was being created by them as if they were not in favour the same till 26th April, 2010, but somehow they were cornered so much that they had to agree to the terms set by IBA. If that would have been the case, then they would not now oppose the petition pending in Madras High Court. That shows the double standards.
But soon the bankers will be able to see the "Asli Chehra" (i.e. True Face) of these union leaders. These union leaders will now not be able to beat around the bush and befool the members by shedding crocodile tears. They have to take a stand in the Madras High Court, as to whether they are in favour of payment by all employees / officers @ 1.6 times or they favour 2.8 times only from PF optees. Some of these unions have already been exposed. Let us see what does the market reports say as at the end of June, 2010.
It is reported that during the course of hearing of the case at Madras High Court, while opposing the interim stay granted by Madras High Court, advocates of IBA, and AIBEA and NCBE, requested for vacation of the stay. AIBEA and NCBE were represented by one of the top most firm namely M/s Aiyar & Dolia and wanted vacation of the interim stay on recovery of 2.8 times only from PF optees to be vacated. So the stands of these two unions are very clear now. They will be using the members’ funds (including PF optees) for payment to the law firms and fighting case against them. However, the Hon’ble Judge advised them to file their counter affidavits and Ordered continuation of the Stay Order. Next hearing has been fixed for 6th July 2010.
Vide circular No. 98 dated 29th June, 2010. AIBOC has declared "We are in constant touch with the IBA and the Convenor of UFBU, to initiate appropriate steps to vacate the stay, at the earliest, to enable IBA to issue necessary instructions to member Banks on the Pension offer". Thus, AIBOC is also likely to oppose the move and appears to be in favour of payment by only PF optees".
(Remember, the stay is not against the Pension offer or issuing circular by IBA, it is only against immediate recovery of 2.8 times of pay of November, 2007 from PF optees. )
The stand of other unions will also be clear within a week, as court in its orders says ""Notice to respondents returnable by 06.07.2010. There shall be an interim order of stay". (all major unions are respondents in this case). The reports indicate that NOBW may support the petition filed by Canara Bank Workers Unions. Similarly, BEFI may not oppose the petition of Canara Bank Workers union. The protest by INBEF has already been incorporated in the affidavit filed in the Court.
If the above reports are true, then 29th June 2010 would be regarded as a sad day in the history of trade union movement of Banking Industry. Souls of great leaders like Parawana Ji would be feeling really sad and dejected.
Till now they have been propagating that they have been forced by the circumstances and situation to accept contributory pension scheme in banking industry. They are giving so many logics and have been pleading as to why they could not make IBA agree to the Pension Scheme in its original form of 1993. We are unable to find any logical reason from Unions wherein it joined hands with the union of the Management i.e. IBA to defeat the efforts of bank employees.
Duniya ke Mazdooron ek ho - Duniya ke mehanatkashon ek ho ka naara laagene waale aaj majdooron ke khilaf hi Court main jaa pahunche.
TESTING TIME IS NOT FAR WAY NOW. NOW THESE UNION LEADERS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SAY THAT IBA DID NOT LET THEM SUFFICIENT TIME AND CORNERED THEM SO SUCH THAT THEY SIGNED THE SETTLEMENT ON 27TH APRIL, 2010. THEY HAVE SUFFICIENT TIME OF OVER A WEEK TO DECIDE WHETHER THEY WANT TO PROTECT THE INTERESTS OF PF OPTEES OR WANT TO DO WHAT IBA IS SAYING.
It has also been reported that some Banks have issued strict instructions for payment of arrears to all the employees / officers by 30th June, 2010 or so, after keeping 2.8 times of the pay of November, 2007 in suspense account. This clearly gives an indication that banks are in a hurry to pay arrears so that they can deduct 2.8 times from the arrears of PF optees before orders of Madras High Court are delivered to them through IBA. In court they will take the plea that notice of stay was not received by them and arrears have already been paid. As Canara Bank has also rushed to pay the arrears today after keeping the 2.8 recovery in suspense, Canara Bank Workers Union is likely to give a strong protest letter on 1st July, 2010 at their Head Office. Canara Bank Workers Union has informed that they are proceeding to Bangalore to personally handover the letter along with a copy of the court order and get the acknowledgement.
Now all the bankers have to take a final call as to whether these union leaders are with the workers or are working against them. We know it is a difficult task as they have to eat their own words. They have issued number of circulars justifying as to why and how they were cornered to agree this changed stand on the night of 26th and 27th April, 2010. However, this is the time when they can correct the mistakes as PF optees have shared the burden of pension even in the last two Bipartite settlements (7th and 8th). This information is now shared by almost everybody (which was not known earlier to 99% of the PF optees).
The unions opposing the petition will be spending lacs of rupees in the legal battle. All this money can be saved if they simple say that we do not oppose the petition and are in favour of the same.
LET PF OPTEES DECLARE THAT THEY WILL QUITE THEIR UNION (WHICHEVER IT MAY BE) IF THEIR UNION OPPOSES THE PETITION FILED BY CANARA BANK WORKERS UNION AT MADRAS HIGH COURT. LET COURT DECIDE THE CASE ON MERITS.
(Inputs also by kamlesh.chaturvedi@yahoo.com; canara bank workers unions etc )
UPDATE ON THE ORDERS ISSUED BY VARIOUS HIGH COURTS AGAINST RECOVERY OF 2.8 TIMES OF NOVEMBER 2007 PAY
In order to ventilate the grievances of the employees, Writ Petitions have been filed in various Hon’ble High Courts.
(A)The First Writ Petition was filed before the Hon’ble Andhra High Court bearing number Writ Petition No. 8237 of 2010 where in Hon’ble Court has passed following orders:
“ORDER: Interim order dated 13-04-2010, to continue, subject to final orders to be passed in this WPMP. Any settlement also, shall be subject to final orders in this WPMP.
Post after Summer Vacation, 2010.”
(B) Writ Petition No. (C) No.3729/2010 has been filed before Hon’ble Delhi High Court, where Hon’ble Court has passed following Orders on 28.05.2010:
“Issue notice to the respondents to show cause as to why rule nisi
be not issued, returnable on 30.07.2010. Necessary steps be taken within seven
days.”
(C) Subsequently, Division Bench of Hon’ble Allahabad High Court while disposing Special Appeal No. 947 of 2010 passed following orders Orders:
“Issue notice.
Respondents are allowed three weeks time to file counter
Affidavit.
List thereafter”
(D) And now recently a Writ Petition bearing no. WP 12269/2010 has been filed before Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras, in the matter of Clause No. 32 of the industry level Wage Revision Settlement dated 27.04.2010 and also clause (1) of the Pension Settlement of even date, seeking a direction from the Hon’ble Court to quash the above clauses only in so far as the said clauses require the provident fund optees now in service to contribute 2.8 times of the Nov 2007 revised pay, if they want to opt for the pension scheme.
Hon’ble Justice K Venkataraman, who heard the matter has ordered an interim stay and the next date of hearing, has been fixed on 06 July 2010. A copy of this order is enclosed.
From what is stated here in above, it is evidently clear that Clause 32 of Settlement dated 27.04.2010 and Clause (1) of Pension Settlement dated 27.04.2010 has become subject matter of judicial scrutiny by the Hon’ble Courts and Hon’ble Madras High Court has passed orders to stay the operation of these clauses.
Monday, June 28, 2010
United Forum of Bank Employees
Bank officers Association are getting monthly subscription of Rs.100 to Rs.200 from each member every month. In addition they will get levy of Rs.3000/ from each member in lieu of bipartite settlement signed on 27th April 2010. Members are happy or not, that is immaterial.
I think total accumulated fund of Officers Association in various banks will grow to hundreds of crores of rupees. This fund is not only enough to meet the usual traveling and staying expenses incurred by union leaders for various issues but also more than enough to meet even entire salaries of all union leaders.
As a matter of fact union leaders are more often than not, busy in union matters and hence they hardly do any work for the branch or office they are posted. It is pity that even officer community in general is not happy with their performance as union leaders. On the contrary their actual energy is lost in saving bad officers and seldom used for any gain for honest workers or for any relief to those honest officers who have been arbitrarily posted in critical areas or rejected in promotion processes due to ill motive of executives. They have failed in giving relief to officers who have been made scapegoat for fraud and irregular credit committed by corrupt officers.
In such position I am of the opinion that these union leaders should be removed from muster roll of the bank and bank should stop paying salary to these leaders. Instead such leaders should be professionally trained to serve the interest of officers who are associated with the union and they should be paid by their parent Union itself. In this way bank will save crores of rupees which are paid as salaries and perquisites to these non performing officers. Bank can use this saved money in creation of new jobs for hundreds and thousands of young unemployed persons. Besides, removing from bank’s duty, union leaders will have full time to think about their members. Since these leaders do only union activities, it will be right from all angle of consideration that their salary should be paid by union fund only.
In case officers do not agree to this proposal or they apprehend that their interest by outsiders will be jeopardized ,they should solemnly declare and take oath that they would not nominate any retired officer as their union leader in future and make best efforts to replace retired officers serving as union leaders with officers who are in service. Because leaders who are no more in service cannot fight seriously and devotedly for better interest of serving employees, rather they look into avenues to cheat serving employees and give maximum benefit to those who have either retired or resigned or removed from the bank. Latest settlement is the ideal example for such sorry state of affairs prevailing in Bank and pitiable position of officers compared to other employees working in Central Government offices or PSUs.
In addition to this they should be made accountable and punishable for any lapse on union activities and their performance should be judged by a group of hundred officers who are actively working in the bank. Expenses incurred by union leaders should be fully scrutinized by a team of at least ten Chartered Accountants and the certified balance sheet of union fund should be circulated among all members. Officer should also appoint some legal experts in each district or at least in state capitals to stop injustice perpetuated by bank management only because they know judicial proceedings in India is too costly and too much cumbersome and time consuming that one is constrained to bear with injustice.
Leaders will then learn a lesson, understand the importance of their role and at least not repeat the history of committing blunder of signing a agreement of wage revision which has instead of solving problems of their poorly paid members has created so many anomalies and tried its best to divide officers community by accepting various discriminatory rules like recovery from PF optees (leaving pension optees), causing loss to VRS optees, resignees, family pension takers, fitment of officers at the state of Rs23520 in scale III and that in scale IV at the same stage and so on. Not only this, many clerks will get better arrear due to this latest settlement compared to officers in junior or middle management. There is no Stagnation in any increment of Central Government employees in ay cadre as per latest Pay Commission Report, but it continues to deprive senior office of annual increment for none of their fault.
If we talk of other issues, it is worthwhile to mention here that management in collusion with violating even their transfer policies, misusing policy meant for rural posting framed by Government of India, misusing policy for posting in North East region, giving promotion to corrupt and flatter officers taking advantage of Interview marks (which an interviewer can give whimsically to make or mar the career of an officer of his choice) Union leaders is silent spectator of torturous treatment given to good officers who are real performers but who do not have time to flatter executives and provide costly gifts to their bosses.
There are thousands of officers who have been continuously working in villages, officers in Non Metros are transferred frequently form one region to other, one state to other and even one zone to other whereas officers posted in Metros are seldom transferred out of their parent state. There is a policy that upto scale III officers will not be transferred out of region but this policy is violated frequently and union leaders remain silent spectators.
There is a policy that an officer cannot work in a region for ten years continuously, management allows many to continue or adjust them back in the same place after giving a formal break of one month outside the state. Is this not enough to prove that there is reign of injustice under the umbrella of union leaders?
Banks are performing better and better despite man power constraints but the real fruits of this growth are hardly shared with junior officers who work hard day and night for the growth.
Reign of injustice prevailing in banking industry at all levels is due to the fact that union leaders are working in nexus with senior officers managing the affairs of the bank. Union leaders are more or less second side of the same coin which is known as that of management. Union leaders and higher executives in bank management are jointly looting the banking industry (there may be some exceptions)and hence they support each other's misdeeds. They jointly harass and humiliate an officer who opposes irregularities and ill works of bosses.
Munsi Prem Chand told, “Jab rakchak hi bhakchak ban jaye to nash nishchit hai” i.e. when protectors become damagers, destruction is unavoidable. And the perpetuation of reign of injustice is possible only because our legal system is not that much effective and quick as it should be. There is no fear in the mind of evil doers who are sitting at the helm of affairs. They do not fear police, they do not fear court cases because they know very well that they, by dint of money power can manage judges, and they can manage advocates and politicians. They know very well that that court will not be able to deliver justice even in two or three decades. This is why whimsical posting, transfers and promotion are taking place in banking industry without any sign of protest from so called union leaders. This is why IBA got success in committing day light robbery of bank employees Entire team of union leaders were silent spectators when Draupdi (bank employees) was facing chirharan in the hands of Kaurav team lead by Duryodhan( IBA I,e, Management)
As such, we have to first ascertain who are our well wisher and who are stabbing us in the back, who are our friends and who are black sheep. We have to distinguish between flatterer and real worker, we have to give respect to those who are working sincerely for us and we should have courage to condemn those who are beating us from the back. Who will save our life, our career, our pay scale, our status and dignity in the community of workers when our union leaders also talk of management's language, when they threaten of harsh action, when they are also trying to vacate the stay granted by Madras High court on recovery from PF optees?
Danendra Jain
I think total accumulated fund of Officers Association in various banks will grow to hundreds of crores of rupees. This fund is not only enough to meet the usual traveling and staying expenses incurred by union leaders for various issues but also more than enough to meet even entire salaries of all union leaders.
As a matter of fact union leaders are more often than not, busy in union matters and hence they hardly do any work for the branch or office they are posted. It is pity that even officer community in general is not happy with their performance as union leaders. On the contrary their actual energy is lost in saving bad officers and seldom used for any gain for honest workers or for any relief to those honest officers who have been arbitrarily posted in critical areas or rejected in promotion processes due to ill motive of executives. They have failed in giving relief to officers who have been made scapegoat for fraud and irregular credit committed by corrupt officers.
In such position I am of the opinion that these union leaders should be removed from muster roll of the bank and bank should stop paying salary to these leaders. Instead such leaders should be professionally trained to serve the interest of officers who are associated with the union and they should be paid by their parent Union itself. In this way bank will save crores of rupees which are paid as salaries and perquisites to these non performing officers. Bank can use this saved money in creation of new jobs for hundreds and thousands of young unemployed persons. Besides, removing from bank’s duty, union leaders will have full time to think about their members. Since these leaders do only union activities, it will be right from all angle of consideration that their salary should be paid by union fund only.
In case officers do not agree to this proposal or they apprehend that their interest by outsiders will be jeopardized ,they should solemnly declare and take oath that they would not nominate any retired officer as their union leader in future and make best efforts to replace retired officers serving as union leaders with officers who are in service. Because leaders who are no more in service cannot fight seriously and devotedly for better interest of serving employees, rather they look into avenues to cheat serving employees and give maximum benefit to those who have either retired or resigned or removed from the bank. Latest settlement is the ideal example for such sorry state of affairs prevailing in Bank and pitiable position of officers compared to other employees working in Central Government offices or PSUs.
In addition to this they should be made accountable and punishable for any lapse on union activities and their performance should be judged by a group of hundred officers who are actively working in the bank. Expenses incurred by union leaders should be fully scrutinized by a team of at least ten Chartered Accountants and the certified balance sheet of union fund should be circulated among all members. Officer should also appoint some legal experts in each district or at least in state capitals to stop injustice perpetuated by bank management only because they know judicial proceedings in India is too costly and too much cumbersome and time consuming that one is constrained to bear with injustice.
Leaders will then learn a lesson, understand the importance of their role and at least not repeat the history of committing blunder of signing a agreement of wage revision which has instead of solving problems of their poorly paid members has created so many anomalies and tried its best to divide officers community by accepting various discriminatory rules like recovery from PF optees (leaving pension optees), causing loss to VRS optees, resignees, family pension takers, fitment of officers at the state of Rs23520 in scale III and that in scale IV at the same stage and so on. Not only this, many clerks will get better arrear due to this latest settlement compared to officers in junior or middle management. There is no Stagnation in any increment of Central Government employees in ay cadre as per latest Pay Commission Report, but it continues to deprive senior office of annual increment for none of their fault.
If we talk of other issues, it is worthwhile to mention here that management in collusion with violating even their transfer policies, misusing policy meant for rural posting framed by Government of India, misusing policy for posting in North East region, giving promotion to corrupt and flatter officers taking advantage of Interview marks (which an interviewer can give whimsically to make or mar the career of an officer of his choice) Union leaders is silent spectator of torturous treatment given to good officers who are real performers but who do not have time to flatter executives and provide costly gifts to their bosses.
There are thousands of officers who have been continuously working in villages, officers in Non Metros are transferred frequently form one region to other, one state to other and even one zone to other whereas officers posted in Metros are seldom transferred out of their parent state. There is a policy that upto scale III officers will not be transferred out of region but this policy is violated frequently and union leaders remain silent spectators.
There is a policy that an officer cannot work in a region for ten years continuously, management allows many to continue or adjust them back in the same place after giving a formal break of one month outside the state. Is this not enough to prove that there is reign of injustice under the umbrella of union leaders?
Banks are performing better and better despite man power constraints but the real fruits of this growth are hardly shared with junior officers who work hard day and night for the growth.
Reign of injustice prevailing in banking industry at all levels is due to the fact that union leaders are working in nexus with senior officers managing the affairs of the bank. Union leaders are more or less second side of the same coin which is known as that of management. Union leaders and higher executives in bank management are jointly looting the banking industry (there may be some exceptions)and hence they support each other's misdeeds. They jointly harass and humiliate an officer who opposes irregularities and ill works of bosses.
Munsi Prem Chand told, “Jab rakchak hi bhakchak ban jaye to nash nishchit hai” i.e. when protectors become damagers, destruction is unavoidable. And the perpetuation of reign of injustice is possible only because our legal system is not that much effective and quick as it should be. There is no fear in the mind of evil doers who are sitting at the helm of affairs. They do not fear police, they do not fear court cases because they know very well that they, by dint of money power can manage judges, and they can manage advocates and politicians. They know very well that that court will not be able to deliver justice even in two or three decades. This is why whimsical posting, transfers and promotion are taking place in banking industry without any sign of protest from so called union leaders. This is why IBA got success in committing day light robbery of bank employees Entire team of union leaders were silent spectators when Draupdi (bank employees) was facing chirharan in the hands of Kaurav team lead by Duryodhan( IBA I,e, Management)
As such, we have to first ascertain who are our well wisher and who are stabbing us in the back, who are our friends and who are black sheep. We have to distinguish between flatterer and real worker, we have to give respect to those who are working sincerely for us and we should have courage to condemn those who are beating us from the back. Who will save our life, our career, our pay scale, our status and dignity in the community of workers when our union leaders also talk of management's language, when they threaten of harsh action, when they are also trying to vacate the stay granted by Madras High court on recovery from PF optees?
Danendra Jain
Saturday, March 13, 2010
MVNair cannot solve Wage issue
Can CMD like MVNair ensure long lasting good health of the bank with the help of bad General Managers? Can Mr. Nair portray attractive balance sheet for long without window dressing when his most of General Managers are corrupt, charge sheeted or facing CBI inquiry.
When General Managers are not of sound mind and spotless integrity, can they expect their juniors to be clean and loyal to bank? When executive holding top posts are not honest and loyal to the bank, honest and efficient junior officers in the field cannot dream of getting promotion and good posting.
This is a bank where promotions take place completely on the whims of Interviewer. Officers who do not toe the line of bosses are posted at critical places. Charge sheeted officers, General Managers, DGMs and AGMs in Mumbai or in any Metro are not transferred out of their home town. But officers belonging to other states who are not having any God father at Administrative offices are posted at such branches which were spoilt by flatter and corrupt officers and who left no stone unturned to keep boss happy through gifting of costly and precious items.
After all who can stop this unhealthy culture prevailing in a bank when person sitting at the helm of affairs are corrupt and shielded by God father in Banking Division in Delhi or RBI or Ministry of Finance. There are many Satyam like Raju in all banks. It is a matter of time when real exposure of these mischievous persons takes place. Yes it is true that by the time their exposure takes place career of many good persons will be spoilt, ruined and raped.
I have however no doubt that future generation will curse MVNair and blame his policy for the fate of bank, though MVNair as a man is very much effective, assertive and knowledgeable.
When General Managers are not of sound mind and spotless integrity, can they expect their juniors to be clean and loyal to bank? When executive holding top posts are not honest and loyal to the bank, honest and efficient junior officers in the field cannot dream of getting promotion and good posting.
This is a bank where promotions take place completely on the whims of Interviewer. Officers who do not toe the line of bosses are posted at critical places. Charge sheeted officers, General Managers, DGMs and AGMs in Mumbai or in any Metro are not transferred out of their home town. But officers belonging to other states who are not having any God father at Administrative offices are posted at such branches which were spoilt by flatter and corrupt officers and who left no stone unturned to keep boss happy through gifting of costly and precious items.
After all who can stop this unhealthy culture prevailing in a bank when person sitting at the helm of affairs are corrupt and shielded by God father in Banking Division in Delhi or RBI or Ministry of Finance. There are many Satyam like Raju in all banks. It is a matter of time when real exposure of these mischievous persons takes place. Yes it is true that by the time their exposure takes place career of many good persons will be spoilt, ruined and raped.
I have however no doubt that future generation will curse MVNair and blame his policy for the fate of bank, though MVNair as a man is very much effective, assertive and knowledgeable.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)